Trusteeship Articles By Topic: Academic And Student Affairs

Richard D. Legon
May/June 2009

Several forces suggest that this is a moment for board leaders and institutional chief executives to review their institutions' commitments to intercollegiate athletics. The recent NCAA basketball championships showcased not only one of the year's most compelling college sports events, but also the appropriate place of college sports at all competitive levels. An NCAA informational campaign, highlighted during the championships, emphasized that most of the more than 400,000 student athletes in our institutions don't pursue careers in professional sports. It was a useful reminder about the purpose of intercollegiate athletics--to produce well-educated men and women whose intercollegiate athletics experiences have helped prepare them for well-rounded and successful lives.

Theodore J. Marchese
May/June 2009

At board meetings, trustees scrutinize their institution's statistical indicators or "dashboard," which often constitutes the administration's brag sheet: "We brought in lots of new students and met our enrollment goals, so the budget looks good."

But there's one indicator--seldom bragged about--that trustees should pay closer attention to: graduation rates.

John M. McCardell, Jr.
May/June 2008

Imagine a city or state with two different sets of laws, where it is impossible to identify which individuals are covered by which laws. Sound ridiculous? Of course, but that is precisely the situation created on college campuses by the 21-year-old drinking age.

Jeffrey Levy
May/June 2008

It is argued that European countries with lower or no drinking-age restriction do not experience the youthful drinking problems we do. A 2005 gov­ernment report concluded, however, that among 15-to-16 year olds in 37 countries, including all major countries in Europe, the only country experienc­ing lower rates of drinking and prevalence of heavy drinking than the U.S. was Turkey. Many countries, including the UK, Germany, and Denmark, experi­enced twice and in some cases more than three times the prevalence of intoxication.

Jo Allen
May/June 2007

Today's accountability pressures require boards to work with presidents and faculty to take on academic quality as a fiduciary responsibility.

Steve Uhlfelder
May/June 2006

Poor student mastery of basic skills shows higher education must maintain higher standards.

Stephen Klein
May/June 2006

Colleges are looking at new ways to assess student learning and institutional effectiveness.

Kevin P. Reilly
March/April 2010

Conversations about “job creation” seem to dominate today’s political landscape. At the same time, institutions of higher education and their trustees are working hard to make a compelling case for sustained public and private support. Taking hold of the current interest in new and better jobs for American workers, universities must herald the job-generating benefits of academic research and development.

Brandon Busteed
March/April 2009

The first misconception is that problem drinking starts before college. That's true for some, but the effect of college on drinking is a very real one. According to our surveys, within six weeks of arriving on campus, abstention drops by 45 percent while high-risk or binge drinking goes up 114 percent. On top of this, college students outpace the drinking of their non-college-going peers--so it's not just a youth issue, it really is a college issue. And despite the myths about "healthier" European drinking, most European countries report higher rates of binge drinking among youth than the U.S. The U.S. ranks 19 of 23 countries surveyed on this measure, ahead of only Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Turkey.

Cathrael Kazin and David G. Payne
March/April 2009

"Attend our university, where we're not sure what--or even if--our students are learning. We have dedicated faculty members and great facilities, so we think we're doing a good job, but the truth is that we have no evidence to support that."

Promotional copy like that might draw some double takes, but not many applicants. Yet, allowing for some hyperbole, this is the situation at many well-regarded institutions of higher education.

Stephen M. Jordan
March/April 2009

Shifting demographics, dramatically changing student bodies, and diminishing state funds now are dictating new national priorities for higher education. It's time for governing boards and their institution's administrators to wake up, have a strong cup of reality, and face these challenges head on. Many boards and institutional leaders have received presentations on projected national demographic changes over the past few decades, but given the enrollment and graduation statistics we see today, it is clear that some have not heard the alarm bells--and that much more must be done to meet the needs of the low-income and minority students who will make up a growing part of the college-age population in the near future.

Myles Brand
March/April 2008

For a trustee on the governing board of one of the more than 1,000 colleges and universities that are members of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), intercollegiate athletics often sparks unparalleled excitement and energy. The feeling might arise as alumni and friends return to campus for a football weekend. It may come in the midst of a championship basketball run. But whether it’s on the campus of a small private liberal-arts college or a large flagship state university, college sports create a sense of community few other campus activities can match.

Andrea J. Loughry
March/April 2008

Development of human capital starts at birth and ends at death, with all the intervening stages closely connected. Yet most states have separate boards regulating separate (and sacred) silos of the educational process. Boards of education handle preschool through grade 12. Higher-education governing boards handle postsecondary and professional education.

Andrew P. Manion
March/April 2008

In an impassioned article in Trusteeship early last year, Patricia McGuire, the president of Trinity University in Washington, D.C., boldly called for college leaders to respond to the U.S. News & World Report reputation survey this way: Throw it in the trash. As of January of this year, the leaders of some 65 colleges and universities, including my own, had sided with McGuire and signed a letter pledging not to complete the U.S. News reputational survey and not to use the rankings to promote their institutions.

David Shi
March/April 2008

A small green shed stands next to an old railroad track on the corner of the Furman University campus in Greenville, S.C. Wander by the place at odd hours, day or night, and you’ll find a student environmental group conducting a sort of educational alchemy—converting leftover vegetable oil from the campus dining hall into diesel fuel.