Trusteeship Articles By Topic: Board Structure and Practice

Elizabeth Bulette
September/October 2011

Developing a board practice that elevates trustees' strategic engagement is a vital function to which few boards assign accountability. With the chair serving as the chief liaison between the board and the president, the vice chair is well placed to focus on enhancing the board's effectiveness.

William J. Byron, S.J.
September/October 2011

The majority of trustees on the boards of Catholic colleges and universities today are lay men and women rather than members of the sponsoring religious community. Lessons for educating lay members on the mission and value of these institutions can be valuable to trustees across all sectors.

Merrill P. Schwartz
September/October 2011

AGB's recently completed "2011 Survey of Higher Education Governance" focused specially on board engagement. Reflecting on responses from the survey, Data File explores the question "To improve your board's engagement, what one change would you like to see?" College presidents, the primary survey respondents, gave a number of different answers.

Clayton M. Christensen and Henry J. Eyring
September/October 2011

Traditional institutions are increasingly concerned with innovation and growth as they compete with online providers for students and tuition dollars. Clayton M. Christensen and Henry J. Eyring, authors of The Innovative University, discuss what boards can do to keep their institutions relevant and competitive.

Slade Sullivan
September/October 2010

We saw the opportunity to say goodbye to board books once and for all, including the thousands of dollars spend each year on paper, printing, binding, and mailing, plus the aggravation of handling the cumbersome volumes.

September/October 2009

The steep economic recession, coupled with increased national expectations and demand for higher education, poses serious challenges for board and presidential leadership. A special panel at AGB's recent National Conference on Trusteeship, moderated by AGB President Richard Legon, examined those challenges. The following Q&A is excerpted from the discussion.

Richard Riddell
July/August 2011

Tips on creating a successful and effective board meeting from an unlikely source: the theater.

Julianne Malveaux
July/August 2011

Interaction between trustees and students can have great reciprical value. However, board members must keep that relationship in perspective with their other critical institution-supporting duties.

 For more on this topic, listen to a podcast with Julianne Malveaux.

David W. Miles
July/August 2011

Even in the best of times, a clear focus is required to prevent urgent day-to-day issues from distracting an institution from long term strategic priorities. Without a strategic plan, supported by key constituents, moving your institution forward becomes a losing battle.

Richard S. Meyers
July/August 2010

Diversity as a tool for cultural enrichment and social justice is embraced throughout higher education. Indeed, AGB’s Statement on Board Accountability states, “A key issue trustees face is the institution’s responsibility to be inclusive in its admissions, aid, hiring practices, and board composition.”

July/August 2010

Experts warn that the competitive landscape for colleges may shift in the wake of the recent global economic downturn and national pressures for increased numbers of college graduates. A special panel at AGB’s recent National Conference on Trusteeship, moderated by AGB President Rick Legon, examined how ready colleges are to adjust to new economic and competitive realities.

Martha W. Summerville, and Charlotte Roberts
July/August 2010

Attitudes about trustee and board engagement are changing. Presidents, board chairs, and trustees increasingly are discussing the need for greater board engagement in governance and more productive partnerships among the board, president, and executive staff. Even boards that already consider themselves to be high performing are finding that external forces and changing demographics have created the need for trustees to become even more engaged and effective.

Charles R. Middleton
July/August 2010

Shared governance is one of the many distinguishing characteristics of quality in American higher education. It is based on the premise that all of us know more than a subset of us, and that you get better results when you consult broadly, especially with those who have a stake in the outcome of the discussion.

Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge
July/August 2010

While appointees to many college and university governing boards are selected based on their career accomplishments, past service, and philanthropic contributions, the role and responsibilities of student trustees are often less clear-cut.

Yet because of a student trustee’s limited time of service, as well as the contradictory pressures a student trustee may experience, it is critical that the student trustee quickly arrive at an appropriate understanding of his or her role in the governing body.

Edwin H. Welch
July/August 2010

College and university boards of trustees customarily delegate a host of responsibilities to board committees. In the minds of many board members and in the practice of most committees, those responsibilities are to monitor various aspects of the institution. The vice president for academic affairs, student affairs, or development reports to the relevant committee on current needs and goals, plans for progress, challenges and successes, and the most recent relevant numbers. Board members listen to the reports, then ask questions to clarify particular items, make suggestions about strategies, share personal anecdotes related to the topic, and consent or approve proposed actions. This comfortable approach leaves board members feeling that they have easily fulfilled their duties and administrators feeling relieved and unchallenged.